Revenue Options
Tax cut and Job Creation
Bill (SB3236/HB3596)
Tax Cuts
SB3236/HB3596 will
eliminate the state part of the sales tax on grocery food, leaving the local
option unaffected. The bill will reduce the sales tax rate on other items from
7% to 5%. The Hall Income Tax will be eliminated and the unearned income
subject to the Hall tax will be subject to a new, broad-based income tax with
generous exemptions and a 3% rate on the first $30,000 over the exemptions and
6% on amounts over that.
State and local taxes
would be reduced for those in the lowest 20% of the population by income from
11.7% to 9.7%, for the middle 20% from 9.3% to 8.0% and for the top 20% will be
slightly increased from 4.5% to 7.0% -- significantly reducing, but not
altogether eliminating the inequalities in our tax structure. The bill will
benefit businesses by removing the real estate base from the Franchise tax and
cutting the rate in half. With all these cuts, according to the Institute on
Taxation and Economic Policy, the bill will still produce about $400 million in
additional revenue for the state because it allows those who have the ability
to pay, who have benefited from the prosperity that our system of government
supports, to contribute more to their own well-being.
Job Creation
What the Tennessee economy
needs to recover from this recession is more consumer spending. The tax cut
effects of this bill will leave more money in the pockets of hardworking
citizens who are struggling to make ends meet and still provide the necessities
for their families. The money would be spent on necessities that have been
deferred during the recession and would recirculate in the economy, resulting
in job retention and creation because of the increased demand for goods and
services. The tax increase on upper income taxpayers would affect savings but
would have a negligible effect on spending.
The additional revenue
will allow us to avoid layoffs of state employees and cuts in funding to
critical government functions, further ameliorating the effects of the
recession and assisting Tennessee’s economic recovery.
Potential revenue: $400
million
Out-of-state sales tax
(SB1741/HB1947)
Ø
The state sales and use tax is the largest source of funding for
Tennessee state government.
Ø
In order to
fund our public structures adequately we need to be really efficient at
collecting the taxes that are due.
Ø
Tennessee is
not collecting sales taxes on a significant portion of the purchases made by
state residents and businesses. We rely on individual taxpayers to voluntarily
report their purchases from out-of-state vendors who do not collect Tennessee
sales taxes. About 2500 taxpayers filed use tax returns last year. There are
over 3.1 million individual federal tax returns filed by Tennesseans each year.
Ø
A report from
the UT Center on Business and Economic Research entitled “State and Local
Government Sales Tax Revenue Losses from Electronic Commerce”, dated April 13,
2009 estimates that for 2010 $310 Million will be lost through purchases from
Internet vendors by Tennessee residents. That does not include losses from mail
order, direct television marketing or cross-border shopping
Ø
The Internet
Parity Act, SB1741/HB1947, as amended, will improve collections by requiring
out-of-state sellers who sell more than $10,000 of merchandise to Tennesseans
and do not collect sales tax to notify their customers at the time of purchase
that they may owe sales (use) taxes to Tennessee. They will also be required to
report annually to each purchaser and to the state Department of Revenue the
total of their purchases.
Ø
Vendors may
avoid the reporting requirement by collecting and remitting the sales taxes.
Ø
The revenue
this will produce can be used to avoid layoffs of state employees and cuts to
critical state functions.
Ø
If purchasers
elect to patronize Tennessee businesses instead of out-of-state businesses,
that will help the local economy and still increase state revenue.
Ø
This is not a
new tax. It is only improving collections for a tax that is already on the
books.
Ø
Failure to
pass this bill would, in effect, be continuing to enable tax evasion.
Ø
If Amazon
terminates its relationship with third party affiliates in Tennessee, that will
be a clear indication that tax evasion is an essential part of their business
model. That would make them a rogue business.
Potential revenue:
uncertain, but not significant in FY 2011
Single article cap:
Technical Corrections bill (SB3901/HB3787)
Existing Tax
Tennessee levies a 7% tax
on sales of most merchandise and some services. Local governments are allowed
to charge additional taxes up to 2.75% on the first $1600 of the purchase
price. For items priced between $1600 and $3200, the state levies a 9.75% tax
on the amount over $1600 with no local option tax. For items priced over $3200,
the state levies a 7% tax on the amount
over $3200. The average combined rate for Tennessee is 9.4%.
Governor’s Proposal
The Governor has proposed
to eliminate the cap by extending the 9.75% rate to the full value of all “big-ticket”
items except vehicles, mobile homes, manufactured housing and boats.
TFT’s Position
TFT has supported complete
elimination of the “single article cap” for years. The cap is an unjustified
tax break for upper income individuals and businesses. If the buyer can afford
to buy items that cost more than $3200, he or she can afford to pay tax at the
same rate as everyone else. There’s no good public policy reason not to
eliminate the cap on all purchases. However, the Governor’s proposal does meet
the requirements of the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement, eliminating one of the
two current obstacles to full compliance by Tennessee.
Potential revenue: $80
million
Combined reporting:
Technical Corrections bill (SB3901/HB3787) vs. Food and Business Tax Fairness
Act (SB0502/HB1350)
We commend the administration for trying to close the captive REIT loophole, and we support this. Nevertheless, it should be understood that this is an ad hoc, loophole-by-loophole approach to reducing corporate tax avoidance. Policymakers in an increasing number of states are recognizing that this approach always leaves them one step behind the smart and highly-compensated lawyers and accountants who dream up these schemes, which is why a majority of states with Corporate Income Taxes have now abandoned this incremental approach and adopted the comprehensive approach of combined reporting. TN should do the same, as we have been advocating for several years now. We urge you to take a close look at SB0502, which is already in Senate Finance. It accomplishes the goal of this measure and nullifies several other tax avoidance schemes.
Potential revenue: $10
million
Cable tax: Technical
Corrections bill (SB3901/HB3787)
The existing tax on cable
television programming exempts the first $15 of the monthly bill. There is no
such exemption for satellite TV programming. The satellite companies have sued
the state of Tennessee over this apparent unfair treatment. They are likely to
prevail and the probable result would be a corresponding exemption for the
satellite companies.
The administration has
included a provision in the Technical Corrections bill (SB3901/HB3787) that
will eliminate the exemption of the first $15 for the cable companies. If passed,
this measure would render the satellite companies’ suit moot and increase state
revenue, compared to the loss of revenue if the suit goes forward without this
measure.
Potential revenue: $24
million